REVIEW PROCESS

Transparent and rigorous peer review for quality assurance

ARTICLE SUBMISSION AND REVIEW PROCESS

The Batticaloa Medical Journal follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of scientific quality and integrity.

Our review process is designed to be fair, transparent, and constructive, providing valuable feedback to authors while maintaining the quality of published research.

REVIEW PROCESS FLOWCHART

1
Submission of Article

Author submits manuscript through our online system

2
Initial Editorial Review

Editors assess suitability for the journal

Article Rejected
If not suitable for the journal
3
Peer Review Process

Double-blind review by 2-3 expert reviewers

4
Reviews Assessed by Editors

Editors evaluate reviewer comments and make decision

Revisions Advised
Author receives detailed feedback
5
Author Resubmits Revised Article

Author addresses reviewer comments and resubmits

Back to Review Stage
6
Article Accepted

Manuscript accepted for publication

1
Submission of Article

Author submits manuscript through our online system

2
Initial Editorial Review

Editors assess suitability for the journal

Article Rejected
3
Peer Review Process

Double-blind review by 2-3 expert reviewers

4
Reviews Assessed by Editors

Editors evaluate reviewer comments and make decision

Revisions Advised
5
Author Resubmits Revised Article

Author addresses reviewer comments and resubmits

Back to Review Stage
6
Article Accepted

Manuscript accepted for publication

DETAILED PROCESS INFORMATION

Timeline

The complete review process typically takes 4-8 weeks. Revision and resubmission may add additional 2-4 weeks depending on the extent of revisions required.

Double-Blind Review

Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process to ensure impartial evaluation.

Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant medical specialty and their publication record.

Constructive Feedback

All reviews provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their manuscripts, regardless of the final decision.

Tips for Authors
  • Ensure your manuscript follows all author guidelines before submission
  • Respond thoroughly to all reviewer comments during revision
  • Provide a detailed response letter explaining how you addressed each comment
  • Submit your revised manuscript within the specified timeframe

QUESTIONS ABOUT THE REVIEW PROCESS?

Our editorial team is here to help you navigate the submission and review process.

CONTACT EDITORIAL OFFICE